{"id":"W4408307931","doi":"10.1002/eco.70012","title":"Enhancing Representativeness of Eddy Covariance Evapotranspiration With Remote Sensing and In Situ Data: A Case Study in the Brazilian Cerrado","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecohydrology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Universidade de São Paulo; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Eddy covariance; Representativeness heuristic; Evapotranspiration; Environmental science; In situ; Covariance; Remote sensing; Hydrology (agriculture); Meteorology; Geography; Geology; Statistics; Mathematics; Ecosystem; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001432944,0.000484504,0.0004783499,0.0008192042,0.0004696113,0.0009505892,0.0008394319,0.0006567605,0.0003427238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00309142,0.0002104129,0.0005115311,0.001517163,0.0003411248,0.0006040104,0.0005351038,0.0003945666,0.00005601863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001259571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005533772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1300534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1695846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994161,0.0002112719,0.00004524379,0.0001324636,0.0001089318,0.00008602417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985186,0.0007311186,0.000174691,0.000174204,0.0003218643,0.00007946214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005693069,0.001270045,0.6836797,0.0006041861,0.0005400377,0.008554447,0.002853279,0.167454,0.03064398,0.002226921,0.001769559,0.09983446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006444776,0.0001875638,0.5761425,0.0000823407,0.0002010963,0.0006878179,0.003053905,0.4067999,0.008007738,0.000636144,0.004062492,0.00007409648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962054,0.000130585,0.002446445,0.0001089523,0.00000611813,0.00001966288,0.0001823973,0.00003674658,0.0008636909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963028,0.00005513935,0.00331435,0.00001043711,0.000004700049,0.000007721649,0.00017573,0.0000128512,0.0001160967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1300534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2585927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01612738308601148,"score_gpt":0.277704002559879,"score_spread":0.2615766194738675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}