{"id":"W4408363852","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2025.103264","title":"A quality assessment framework for transdisciplinary research design, monitoring, and evaluation: Guidance for application","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MethodsX","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Systems engineering; Quality (philosophy); Quality assessment; Computer science; Engineering; Management science; Biochemical engineering; Reliability engineering; Evaluation methods","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08475932,0.0001224625,0.0002796285,0.0003646401,0.0010204,0.000396241,0.0005815299,0.0001479111,0.00001999158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01039295,0.00009905273,0.00009456383,0.001525668,0.0001863449,0.0002751252,0.0001677605,0.0002354509,0.000004473823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002147198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006545441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004357218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000118415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925198,0.003853471,0.000695335,0.0007792225,0.001762448,0.0003897421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742115,0.02082835,0.0001475243,0.0007465021,0.003965181,0.0001009774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001393389,0.0001710956,0.00205035,0.0001174756,0.00004692978,2.902353e-7,0.002958437,0.0005476155,0.01011657,0.20704,0.006534112,0.7690237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005385622,0.0004160953,0.01750374,0.0000481202,0.00001318805,2.597411e-7,0.004013774,0.05586932,0.005808001,0.9108888,0.004802249,0.00009789925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01379299,0.0006221451,0.972166,0.007904177,0.000376027,0.003944954,0.00003230725,0.00002280982,0.001138571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2401312,0.00000745503,0.7521905,0.00001892603,0.0002415755,0.005968264,0.000006845193,0.000008502028,0.001426686],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7689258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6778264287683097,"score_gpt":0.7218828688517024,"score_spread":0.04405644008339271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}