{"id":"W4408826471","doi":"10.7202/1117030ar","title":"L’« oubli » des femmes comme sujets pensants","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":3,"stratum":"french","weight":1554.46666666667,"opus":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":true,"confidence":"medium","reason":"Analyzes the representation of women authors in the Quebec journal Philosophiques over fifty years through the lens of epistemic injustice; the object is authorship and workforce equity in a Canadian scholarly venue."},"gpt":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"This examines women’s authorship and representation in a scholarly journal, making scholarly communication and research workforce equity the objects of study."},"grok":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":true,"confidence":"high","reason":"Analyzes women's underrepresentation as authors in Philosophiques and epistemic injustice in scholarly publishing; equity of the research workforce and a Canadian journal as object."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00270555,0.0003949025,0.0003654452,0.001027606,0.009467554,0.003520363,0.0004997496,0.002039789,0.005933088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005144182,0.0002603147,0.0003000935,0.001177461,0.00745064,0.00351804,0.002841952,0.004005196,0.0004992069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002506223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001811303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03627933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06401567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981852,0.001079921,0.00004092037,0.0001723152,0.0001731644,0.0003484616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986498,0.0007452302,0.0001976802,0.00007676419,0.0001717336,0.0001587286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007194352,0.0000318934,0.008632601,0.0001649296,0.00001022164,0.00075382,0.8782837,0.00005110495,0.0008742844,0.07276331,0.003980158,0.03438206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005775504,0.00009467066,0.02445233,0.0005543138,0.00001156245,0.0009154622,0.7550562,0.00006594552,0.000417294,0.008367012,0.2100129,0.00004648111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8441894,0.01504849,0.003598751,0.04425858,0.001474045,0.00005021011,0.0001791678,0.00002821226,0.09117323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673006,0.005648542,0.0009776136,0.00297835,0.0001814756,0.00004836748,0.00003845957,0.00001860069,0.02280783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03627933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8742908469433862,"score_gpt":0.5618413953948473,"score_spread":0.3124494515485389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}