{"id":"W4408828601","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-26021","title":"Potential of anogenital distance as a genetic selection trait in Canadian Holsteins","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dairy Science","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Alberta Milk; Alberta Agriculture and Forestry; Genome Alberta; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Trait; Biology; Anogenital distance; Genetics; Evolutionary biology; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001397982,0.0003749264,0.0004802468,0.002079823,0.001590512,0.001096862,0.001089575,0.0003142315,0.001419279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002751301,0.000143914,0.0004628634,0.004679108,0.0006256027,0.0002327896,0.0005191661,0.0003829572,0.000197089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009802548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007375088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9686339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992003,0.00008014416,0.00002517734,0.000270638,0.0002325058,0.000191351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984665,0.0003060086,0.0002353746,0.0001319452,0.00070556,0.0001547293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002510264,0.00003075272,0.9588004,0.0001082987,0.000360479,0.0002134537,0.0006884079,0.003437018,0.001966949,0.0007700441,0.004677472,0.02869559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009629211,0.00001024788,0.990169,0.00003637861,0.00007608834,0.00005025081,0.0003635184,0.003681825,0.0001814199,0.0001374557,0.005261288,0.00002287128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833108,0.0009879768,0.00139887,0.0002106773,0.00001395099,0.00001745047,0.01172373,0.00005305235,0.002283427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786926,0.0004535491,0.002282086,0.0001041401,0.000008476927,0.00001815638,0.01692064,0.00002429434,0.001496025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03136611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07112283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004249205743364097,"score_gpt":0.2335462288107737,"score_spread":0.2292970230674096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}