{"id":"W4408962963","doi":"10.61091/jcmcc125-25","title":"Algorithmic design of a conditional value-at-risk optimization model based on implied volatility for multi-period portfolio adjustment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Econometrics; Portfolio optimization; Volatility (finance); Value at risk; Implied volatility; Economics; Period (music); Value (mathematics); Financial economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Risk management; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001618294,0.0009630256,0.001672947,0.0007500341,0.0006308237,0.00151504,0.001421591,0.001344616,0.003518167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003036052,0.0008024437,0.001299291,0.0007676738,0.0007118528,0.001219341,0.001923448,0.001841918,0.0003156649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009923707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002131516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007328274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00441683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993231,0.0002263302,0.00004232917,0.0001669082,0.0001368233,0.0001045348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989641,0.0006221625,0.0001245285,0.0000410092,0.0001875261,0.00006066677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001494932,0.00001016961,0.0003722154,0.00002456195,0.00002324155,0.00003397303,0.00002108114,0.9832787,0.0002481518,0.009525928,0.0002999501,0.00614715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003614694,0.000006517468,0.00003261386,0.000002214261,0.000004376384,0.000005480846,0.000002580518,0.9975066,0.00004149479,0.002284297,0.0001078352,0.000002459998],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008768924,0.0001551981,0.9888475,0.0001691545,0.00001929708,0.00003616551,0.00004585027,0.0001141589,0.001843694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.724906,0.0005927203,0.2685948,0.0002066448,0.00006816097,0.0006050993,0.0003806568,0.0001378815,0.004507916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007328274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04885582582989285,"score_gpt":0.3402111267827095,"score_spread":0.2913553009528166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}