{"id":"W4408973757","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107295","title":"Stakeholder orientation and accounting conservatism: Evidence from state-level constituency statutes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Waterloo; Central University of Finance and Economics; University of Alberta; Canadian Academic Accounting Association","keywords":"Statute; Conservatism; Accounting; Stakeholder; State (computer science); Business; Orientation (vector space); Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452824,0.0002894141,0.0004282127,0.0009497411,0.0004590424,0.002181494,0.0003768013,0.00008533587,0.00007264639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02306831,0.0002725585,0.00006555374,0.0011395,0.0002277071,0.006460357,0.0003934117,0.0004359303,0.0000124133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000979107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004095961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009938828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003211587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976799,0.00003336693,0.0008675138,0.000370002,0.00054839,0.0005008524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874628,0.000523751,0.01089754,0.0002142114,0.0008600744,0.0000416257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004376197,0.00004193227,0.8148674,0.0002849382,0.0001412818,0.00001902442,0.0002713258,0.00002341807,0.000576969,0.0207622,0.008681573,0.1542862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001571064,0.00002009457,0.8517285,0.001465544,0.0001757986,0.00001654584,0.001267148,0.0007855927,0.00006002206,0.01752464,0.1249277,0.0004573754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518991,0.001387844,0.03438183,0.008776619,0.000524785,0.0001763533,0.00001835981,0.00006217483,0.002772903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913033,0.0005787928,0.001365531,0.005063546,0.001244726,0.000004834956,0.000008377815,0.00002550079,0.0004053634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1538288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04119413008577612,"score_gpt":0.2678027896572041,"score_spread":0.226608659571428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}