{"id":"W4409003496","doi":"10.17269/s41997-024-00989-0","title":"Reimagining Indigenous healthcare through a readiness to practice lens: A quantitative content analysis of the empirical literature","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary","funders":"Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary; University of Calgary","keywords":"Indigenous; Content (measure theory); Content analysis; Lens (geology); Health care; Through-the-lens metering; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07802939,0.0005842318,0.001641605,0.01787615,0.002400432,0.007299885,0.001402281,0.0009548117,0.001824867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1681929,0.0007094351,0.00164029,0.01763449,0.005901911,0.00558398,0.004855866,0.001300743,0.0001491626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01262789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03337748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008466645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01878362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9489318,0.03399488,0.006700309,0.001787865,0.007568978,0.001016278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8268618,0.1466735,0.008033004,0.002526545,0.01519101,0.0007141625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001422744,0.00008394785,0.01638835,0.0897864,0.0005986078,0.0005808558,0.7422744,0.0003012962,0.001154043,0.0165608,0.002816364,0.1293126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008607437,0.0002925792,0.03375837,0.1294071,0.001526057,0.0006203191,0.7811524,0.0006305265,0.001259942,0.007069197,0.04407163,0.0001257322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.7381493,0.1427549,0.04181881,0.01610189,0.0008016917,0.02529354,0.003504659,0.0001134681,0.03146173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8425808,0.05521883,0.07225297,0.002620114,0.0001153128,0.02447426,0.0008539795,0.00008162492,0.001802054],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4126638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2247656997019377,"score_gpt":0.4482883745281739,"score_spread":0.2235226748262362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}