{"id":"W4409049443","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0320570","title":"Assessing construct reliability through open-ended survey response analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Copying; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Construct validity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Construct (python library); Replicate; Open science; Computer science; Applied psychology; Internal consistency; Data science; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2770076,0.001505939,0.001518734,0.007743114,0.001685344,0.002557702,0.001718775,0.001302351,0.003488404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3862795,0.0009714696,0.002263309,0.006408896,0.002680454,0.002432479,0.005220487,0.001913519,0.001359474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001869859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003172775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001030493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001328078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7011861,0.204698,0.04334414,0.01076292,0.03674819,0.003260637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4124562,0.3826866,0.03413132,0.03864013,0.1304652,0.001620616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002465609,0.002182567,0.4316419,0.006116046,0.001325006,0.0003310799,0.09909143,0.005386909,0.01816872,0.01499899,0.01218113,0.4061106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001067649,0.006354487,0.71543,0.003747914,0.0008938861,0.0006309893,0.03878135,0.07485722,0.04038262,0.02981205,0.08720777,0.0008341444],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5777178,0.0004415508,0.3854748,0.0008130759,0.0003235308,0.0197615,0.002279643,0.001285085,0.01190309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7284324,0.0002353459,0.2076387,0.0003800027,0.00009087584,0.05888275,0.002319588,0.0003656193,0.001654755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7229924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3330479738373842,"score_gpt":0.4834066614219122,"score_spread":0.1503586875845281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}