{"id":"W4409089480","doi":"10.14796/jwmm.s545","title":"Water Quality Assessment of Urban Canals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Effectiveness of Renovation Efforts in Minimizing Pollution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Management Modeling","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City; Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education","keywords":"Ho chi minh; Pollution; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Quality (philosophy); Water resource management; Environmental protection; Environmental engineering; Geography; Cartography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005874772,0.0003553519,0.0003660816,0.0006956308,0.0007336526,0.0009731881,0.0003329383,0.0002936577,0.0005285089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008014063,0.000191324,0.000267726,0.001308031,0.0005591455,0.0005783764,0.0006019842,0.0002128307,0.00006218306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001707808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002543892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06082096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1302714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995286,0.0001033513,0.00003511855,0.0001072167,0.0001433757,0.00008226681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999295,0.0000867853,0.0002159479,0.00002924099,0.0002832576,0.00008974363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001893579,0.0001992225,0.916362,0.0003584569,0.0001080729,0.0007946637,0.005124947,0.003771822,0.03455941,0.0002411073,0.0003515539,0.03793939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001971547,0.0005237849,0.9659867,0.0000542851,0.0001050255,0.0002763548,0.01495606,0.003873131,0.009315471,0.0001049089,0.004740965,0.00004368887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989533,0.000130277,0.0002179884,0.0000254352,0.000002837852,0.00004118065,0.00009836684,0.000005971689,0.0005244461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988229,0.0001406434,0.0005059044,0.00001727958,0.000001688666,0.00002919486,0.00009482347,0.000003123165,0.0003844585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06082096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1209339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03569000371864726,"score_gpt":0.3246483358624964,"score_spread":0.2889583321438491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}