{"id":"W4409205327","doi":"10.18280/ijsdp.200311","title":"Balancing Heritage Preservation and Sustainable Development in Historic Cities: A Case Study of Old Najaf in the Context of Global Best Practices","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Environmental planning; World heritage; Sustainable development; Geography; Environmental resource management; Best practice; Cultural heritage; Regional science; Environmental protection; Archaeology; Political science; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002087263,0.0005157104,0.000407355,0.001435605,0.01579987,0.003318409,0.001632337,0.002651331,0.002471363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001522654,0.0003738186,0.0003932885,0.00196434,0.00631906,0.002094283,0.003027107,0.001886242,0.0001997668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00792445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003288398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05448509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2081635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986665,0.00068476,0.0000259504,0.00007642143,0.0001190124,0.0004273361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989688,0.0004301002,0.0001277083,0.00006640961,0.0001242374,0.0002827631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001927175,0.0009284257,0.04928251,0.0004130341,0.000046169,0.06207968,0.8307713,0.001658938,0.001919186,0.01756118,0.00380604,0.03134089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006816414,0.00009359934,0.01057798,0.0001269668,0.00001653492,0.001581621,0.9658397,0.0003204765,0.0003465765,0.0005145812,0.02055757,0.00001743997],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992436,0.0002348628,0.0003482058,0.0007520164,0.00002099988,0.00003765163,0.00002379716,0.000004041401,0.006142361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949391,0.0004756421,0.0008205534,0.0001812604,0.0000144873,0.00003111569,0.00002070689,0.000006333339,0.003510866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05448509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1083359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06544151756273114,"score_gpt":0.2958580590301193,"score_spread":0.2304165414673882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}