{"id":"W4409236767","doi":"10.1051/epjconf/202532305002","title":"Bayesian Analysis of Combustion Kinetic Models for Ammonia-Hydrogen Fuel Blends Using Artificial Neural Networks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Web of Conferences","topic":"Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Combustion; Artificial neural network; Bayesian probability; Ammonia; Kinetic energy; Hydrogen; Environmental science; Computer science; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001019538,0.0001708643,0.0005100942,0.0005324477,0.00003432616,0.00001110778,0.000290316,0.0001508896,0.00002502034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001122042,0.0001707519,0.000189763,0.001108067,0.000127784,0.0001061729,0.00006258003,0.0001437311,9.944669e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002992904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001010031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004423092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003911075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988623,0.00001657346,0.0005147674,0.0002305321,0.0001455417,0.000230314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991096,0.0002018037,0.0001977489,0.0002750579,0.0001863281,0.00002945957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002888946,0.00002419798,0.0003035636,0.00005852272,0.0002793383,2.589217e-7,0.00001543204,0.8811749,0.007289415,0.1052922,0.000002927202,0.005530308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000190028,0.00003450767,0.00006322152,0.00005243592,0.0005945438,2.123528e-7,0.0001329264,0.9531769,0.02590069,0.01969592,0.00002470921,0.0001339632],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1421897,0.0002574835,0.8563964,0.00007981109,0.0001019183,0.0001380688,0.00002112388,0.0001500505,0.0006654367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908356,0.00002719869,0.009021644,0.000007347735,0.00002108577,0.00001922449,0.00002861487,0.00001054627,0.00002873485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8486459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6963059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02983330890077089,"score_gpt":0.2794560080735774,"score_spread":0.2496226991728065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}