{"id":"W4409236767","doi":"10.1051/epjconf/202532305002","title":"Bayesian Analysis of Combustion Kinetic Models for Ammonia-Hydrogen Fuel Blends Using Artificial Neural Networks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Web of Conferences","topic":"Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Combustion; Artificial neural network; Bayesian probability; Ammonia; Kinetic energy; Hydrogen; Environmental science; Computer science; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001374293,0.0006466678,0.0005604885,0.0006835831,0.0003249076,0.0006395095,0.0006385957,0.0007940059,0.0008909352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00291385,0.0005808904,0.0006899899,0.0003651544,0.0004471445,0.0008088548,0.0006165607,0.0007562076,0.0001212809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001124501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009730175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01117279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997029,0.0001236326,0.000017593,0.00004432052,0.00008416478,0.00002740583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.0006149403,0.0001318739,0.00003132172,0.0001298281,0.00002443718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001476314,0.00001264118,0.0003297343,0.000009909112,0.0000107134,0.000006701057,0.000006410422,0.9943256,0.0005057146,0.0009619601,0.00003999814,0.003775832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.497308e-7,0.000001288848,0.00004355087,5.601799e-7,6.427476e-7,4.964434e-7,4.972299e-7,0.9995884,0.00007714619,0.0002698873,0.00001580369,0.000001096212],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1504199,0.0002873674,0.8453333,0.0002379185,0.00002662373,0.00004417601,0.000174511,0.0003828087,0.003093274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489108,0.000197947,0.04864649,0.00004989347,0.00001948014,0.00009343185,0.000236571,0.00006211321,0.001783328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01117279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02221555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02983330890077089,"score_gpt":0.2794560080735774,"score_spread":0.2496226991728065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}