{"id":"W4409258209","doi":"10.1061/jaeied.aeeng-1920","title":"Design Guidelines for FRP-Faced Foam Core Sandwich Panels: Review and Building Code Compliance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Architectural Engineering","topic":"Cellular and Composite Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sandwich-structured composite; Metal foam; Structural engineering; Core (optical fiber); Aluminium foam sandwich; Compliance (psychology); Fibre-reinforced plastic; Sandwich panel; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Architectural engineering; Materials science; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002215586,0.0002077237,0.0004222054,0.0001526961,0.00005087356,0.0000350455,0.000198358,0.00004464133,0.000004208042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001693604,0.0001717906,0.0001230057,0.0001521267,0.00001382306,0.00006549466,0.00003205362,0.0002506595,1.764842e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003742395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001723003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001112912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.095111e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990616,0.00001006031,0.0005001505,0.0001082883,0.00009618122,0.0002237626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993894,0.0001780743,0.00007300263,0.0001174897,0.0001648845,0.00007714485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002636264,0.000002454633,0.00001324642,0.002135918,0.0001787129,0.000005730922,0.00006025808,0.8690612,0.102878,0.0001203162,0.001166868,0.02435094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001552151,0.000183776,0.001425574,0.007624987,0.0005259861,0.001010596,0.0000221279,0.9100619,0.05580053,0.001635882,0.01947237,0.0006841431],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04896258,0.07432356,0.8751719,0.0005863484,0.0005114276,0.0003124462,0.000007805319,0.00008941415,0.00003450301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7453462,0.004570856,0.2492864,0.0003561358,0.0002957379,0.00001478551,0.000003069649,0.0000554828,0.00007129302],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6963837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7005419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07233285595674634,"score_gpt":0.3252019939090565,"score_spread":0.2528691379523102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}