{"id":"W4409656814","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/y569z_v1","title":"Investigating journal peer review as scientific object of study: unabridged version – Part II","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Preprint; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04662154,0.0007407728,0.001308232,0.005333369,0.005708123,0.0294003,0.003014842,0.005384711,0.01391274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2166986,0.0007287772,0.00108466,0.006975673,0.03033072,0.01662035,0.009289159,0.007509977,0.00433559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006905688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001865154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001039568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9546916,0.02248298,0.003279809,0.004967122,0.01337054,0.001207917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7493886,0.1771958,0.0162199,0.02284736,0.03111277,0.003235465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007702694,0.0001089393,0.003628239,0.002996299,0.00006217188,0.00008535576,0.01916327,0.000233909,0.0004871713,0.8391889,0.05038104,0.08358762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004693028,0.0001938229,0.01099739,0.01569828,0.0001211135,0.0004699095,0.01334597,0.001281191,0.001028556,0.3081635,0.6485336,0.0001197423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04536217,0.1937902,0.0587982,0.3502095,0.1124723,0.001414636,0.0011317,0.0003777543,0.2364437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6311776,0.1121164,0.03941208,0.07508024,0.082073,0.004562197,0.001849808,0.001375361,0.05235326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2465612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7596824354113867,"score_gpt":0.6267780326723678,"score_spread":0.1329044027390189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}