{"id":"W4409864251","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1509988","title":"On stance-taking with one-sided vs. two-sided shoulder lifts in German talk-in-interaction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Conversation analysis; Psychology; Shoulders; German; Conversation; Turn-taking; Framing (construction); Cognitive psychology; Gaze; Lift (data mining); Communication; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002361047,0.0001962614,0.0003597126,0.0007872338,0.00008561325,0.0001004445,0.0003602073,0.00009479999,0.0004750584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005596466,0.0001826378,0.00004037981,0.0001996184,0.0002650566,0.0003031401,0.00003886674,0.0005631389,0.00001305446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001683221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005289369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004274129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02154862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984883,0.0002320751,0.0004205524,0.0003864781,0.0001331551,0.0003394329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990003,0.0001389847,0.0001867375,0.0006051105,0.00004307715,0.00002583398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003718102,0.001771755,0.03752605,0.0001016433,0.000262729,0.0003248566,0.09586002,0.0007920288,0.0001835708,0.7375565,0.07566248,0.04624023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02623275,0.001068155,0.1263101,0.004735943,0.0001285074,0.00003643088,0.1382833,0.00186394,0.0004613648,0.5036226,0.1948967,0.002360228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5039037,0.0008773587,0.001677041,0.003288764,0.002894193,0.000455467,0.000008638012,0.00008734383,0.4868075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951218,0.0001041009,0.0009996152,0.002117176,0.00008877736,0.00009748359,0.00002689305,0.00002310169,0.001421036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4912181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04193179450433241,"score_gpt":0.3727808125023471,"score_spread":0.3308490179980146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}