{"id":"W4409908023","doi":"10.1093/bioadv/vbaf103","title":"Assessing accuracy and specificity of faecal source library for microbial source-tracking, using SourceTracker as case study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioinformatics Advances","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Melbourne Water","keywords":"Source tracking; Open source; Tracking (education); Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01564055,0.00132643,0.001274099,0.00268331,0.001100811,0.00319449,0.001473728,0.002078759,0.001786864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03710006,0.0005675725,0.001004544,0.002135406,0.001527558,0.001532151,0.002955687,0.0009881599,0.002427574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008665117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001533094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005176714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009775301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834673,0.003188995,0.001541557,0.003572435,0.007417248,0.0008125057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740276,0.009625304,0.003579443,0.002828136,0.009351073,0.0005885186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001269856,0.0005406227,0.2195844,0.003740498,0.0003982457,0.001493341,0.005319367,0.006471456,0.5699604,0.001492083,0.004386252,0.1853434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002655784,0.001288382,0.1006777,0.0008503611,0.0003525088,0.002488863,0.002201829,0.02355097,0.8395519,0.001634515,0.02713139,0.0002450879],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7156327,0.003206492,0.26026,0.001112371,0.0002882679,0.001399114,0.006506653,0.003853921,0.007740545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6557088,0.001608099,0.3277626,0.0006045959,0.00006333148,0.0008675598,0.007087052,0.001109165,0.005188743],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01564055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08271617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04425365662850683,"score_gpt":0.3352390906556071,"score_spread":0.2909854340271003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}