{"id":"W4410106930","doi":"10.1101/2025.05.02.25326892","title":"Assessing Ankle Range of Motion with Wearable Technology: A Comparative Accuracy and Reliability Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Wearable computer; Range of motion; Ankle; Motion (physics); Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Wearable technology; Reliability engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Physical therapy; Medicine; Physics; Aerospace engineering; Embedded system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01795143,0.000610455,0.0007899043,0.001720786,0.0003266752,0.00101084,0.0006663199,0.0007594404,0.0008021195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03763932,0.0003961354,0.000906402,0.001284366,0.0007796881,0.0009902183,0.0008363107,0.0003559047,0.0004439502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002638733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003209861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006603071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009569962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832223,0.008555003,0.001806565,0.001735139,0.00438823,0.0002927478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453868,0.03132442,0.005550395,0.003857468,0.01341159,0.0004692995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002230868,0.0003640439,0.9232281,0.0004077721,0.001020538,0.00009187643,0.001243143,0.0005128003,0.005285894,0.00017209,0.0002687045,0.06517427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001726572,0.007561635,0.9791398,0.0001728781,0.001005281,0.0009841271,0.0009387467,0.005514533,0.002911268,0.0002241363,0.001324429,0.00005038862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850425,0.002388528,0.010189,0.00004835404,0.00009944472,0.00018473,0.0001970632,0.0000613006,0.001788991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953024,0.0003329494,0.003871129,0.00002687581,0.00005297683,0.00009692697,0.0001334664,0.00001302004,0.0001702843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01795143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09493738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05444237391586784,"score_gpt":0.3556523668387901,"score_spread":0.3012099929229223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}