{"id":"W4410168570","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.159117.2","title":"Women's studies in the Latin American context: a bibliometric approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Gender and Feminist Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open peer review; Plant biology; Context (archaeology); Latin Americans; Physiology; Bibliometrics; Open science; Medicine; Neuroscience; Biology; Library science; History; Political science; Computer science; Botany; Archaeology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01675238,0.0006536501,0.001806302,0.146649,0.002286696,0.01148741,0.001101047,0.001096211,0.006082265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05392978,0.0002722795,0.001118011,0.2698194,0.002321373,0.003717273,0.004883929,0.0005636541,0.0005831817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006166937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009031489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01049769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01157167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850779,0.006363001,0.002449112,0.0008532237,0.004715456,0.0005413424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621884,0.02543808,0.004956664,0.001437826,0.005482062,0.0004970179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000258305,0.000324968,0.3043598,0.04661423,0.001815945,0.001189813,0.04386733,0.002206615,0.002346023,0.08810629,0.04086326,0.4680475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008523062,0.0001655002,0.5369399,0.01192582,0.001342341,0.0008902579,0.09972026,0.004407535,0.001383785,0.03475605,0.3082314,0.0001518293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.557495,0.09705449,0.02689737,0.02121853,0.001267259,0.007984733,0.09478895,0.0008388914,0.1924548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774325,0.03825923,0.05405394,0.0007761274,0.0008360856,0.006977464,0.01719493,0.0001222206,0.004347542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.853351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08859611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3634660410367859,"score_gpt":0.4998936922402162,"score_spread":0.1364276512034304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}