{"id":"W4410355910","doi":"10.1016/j.jspr.2025.102672","title":"Phosphine as a possible alternative to methyl bromide for the phytosanitary treatment of wood products","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Stored Products Research","topic":"Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Canadian Forest Service; Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australian Government","keywords":"Phytosanitary certification; Phosphine; Bromide; Fumigation; Chemistry; Toxicology; Horticulture; Environmental science; Biology; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007551792,0.0002381486,0.0003662655,0.001124161,0.0002600969,0.0007441328,0.0004753921,0.0007026112,0.008417275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009981509,0.0001054418,0.000637228,0.0005771894,0.0002820889,0.0008913013,0.0003873729,0.0004879673,0.000734147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002663486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000624667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000886124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003817897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994143,0.0002392251,0.00006557388,0.00008154771,0.0001507587,0.00004872748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992929,0.0002691439,0.0002623754,0.00002580547,0.000111525,0.00003829524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003611582,0.001308212,0.007536877,0.06093392,0.0007228522,0.002803704,0.0007191275,0.0009838982,0.2281949,0.00584143,0.008640363,0.6787031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005588925,0.01845377,0.03790759,0.01363376,0.00329729,0.005432702,0.002238798,0.001142399,0.2421096,0.004836528,0.6702386,0.0001501006],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3093904,0.6310284,0.005625627,0.00602001,0.0007569391,0.0004136678,0.001422665,0.0002217505,0.04512053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7939503,0.1848848,0.01016228,0.001819354,0.0002233903,0.00008546092,0.0005049583,0.00003672132,0.008332818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008417275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02815861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06723934184607697,"score_gpt":0.3792022848734182,"score_spread":0.3119629430273412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}