{"id":"W4410392877","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118073","title":"Trade-offs and synergies in the management of environmental pressures: a case study on ship noise mitigation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Marine Pollution Bulletin","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Norges Forskningsråd; Horizon 2020; Academy of Finland; Havforskningsinstituttet; Havs- och Vattenmyndigheten","keywords":"Noise (video); Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Business; Noise pollution; Environmental noise; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Oceanography; Computer science; Economics; Sound (geography); Geology; Noise reduction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009392048,0.0008601164,0.0008291277,0.002085854,0.002026538,0.003077492,0.001437861,0.002661146,0.002688501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01092152,0.0003095463,0.001660318,0.001921389,0.002055549,0.002101889,0.002904953,0.001879373,0.0002432644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003678851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003975611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01014303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02619144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912344,0.005407528,0.0003352017,0.0004762568,0.001599722,0.0009469673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984605,0.01171681,0.001299779,0.0005115314,0.001231713,0.0006351308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002375186,0.01000658,0.1817019,0.005831109,0.002421463,0.03500402,0.01845661,0.3966873,0.02203193,0.1058055,0.008389008,0.2112894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001505681,0.0149185,0.2612727,0.003469007,0.003428848,0.005197437,0.1261946,0.3566758,0.02981513,0.0888798,0.1077237,0.0009188792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9480069,0.001526919,0.01565584,0.002410043,0.00008170427,0.0007058172,0.0002555852,0.00004424444,0.03131297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811754,0.001065111,0.0145732,0.0002894202,0.00003579342,0.0002564196,0.00007131894,0.00001876206,0.00251464],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01014303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04967052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02032770574795156,"score_gpt":0.2657372750570415,"score_spread":0.2454095693090899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}