{"id":"W4410446250","doi":"10.21105/joss.06256","title":"AutoEIS: Automated equivalent circuit modeling from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data using statistical machine learning","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Open Source Software","topic":"Machine Learning in Materials Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dielectric spectroscopy; Equivalent circuit; Electrical impedance; Computer science; Electrochemistry; Data mining; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Electrical engineering; Chemistry; Engineering; Voltage","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00502575,0.0003137098,0.0006662178,0.0001163033,0.0006803634,0.0009229545,0.005882871,0.0001005682,0.001012109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003218114,0.000223719,0.00005923808,0.0003861794,0.0002371393,0.000824422,0.002763451,0.0009135509,0.00004320014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002149269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005834959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001071131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001251724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959322,0.001044036,0.001040668,0.0005139931,0.0008231044,0.0006460436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967982,0.0009823866,0.0008050776,0.001018548,0.0002336253,0.0001621228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003164889,0.00005544113,0.001555087,0.0000342442,0.00004122247,0.00001654662,0.0004382868,0.1551183,0.8415407,0.00007146158,0.0004704514,0.0003417546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006615967,0.0001105514,0.0001736243,0.0003582987,0.0001949495,0.0001270778,0.0001801179,0.9537688,0.04143792,0.002299568,0.0004242981,0.000263134],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.444789,0.000442266,0.5538633,0.0001714916,0.0003153485,0.0001606225,0.00005614605,0.000156423,0.00004535764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169786,0.00004959654,0.1822054,0.0002892835,0.0002283733,0.000002241321,0.00004325708,0.00005011283,0.0001531214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8001028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05460475755469317,"score_gpt":0.3611702634317597,"score_spread":0.3065655058770665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}