{"id":"W4410446285","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.159117.3","title":"Women's studies in the Latin American context: a bibliometric approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Social Sciences and Humanities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open peer review; Plant biology; Context (archaeology); Latin Americans; Bibliometrics; Physiology; Medicine; Biology; Neuroscience; Library science; Geography; Political science; Botany; Computer science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02216528,0.0008251864,0.002348729,0.1740558,0.002680764,0.01283397,0.001283667,0.001277617,0.004027295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06603669,0.0003433769,0.00135294,0.298986,0.002656937,0.004272385,0.005630532,0.0006536262,0.0004431838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006664662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01148484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009127215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009869929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.978727,0.009520109,0.003445906,0.001245621,0.006397783,0.000663523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950625,0.03367746,0.006360053,0.001997382,0.006673928,0.0006661709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002882615,0.0003639098,0.3270567,0.05326432,0.002494639,0.001226535,0.04578104,0.002456459,0.00222812,0.07365546,0.0232758,0.4679087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001111248,0.0002503163,0.5568364,0.01390886,0.002144354,0.001028629,0.1152594,0.005771372,0.00148868,0.04382089,0.2591857,0.0001943538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5646003,0.138436,0.03714773,0.01810828,0.001203154,0.00927871,0.06590182,0.0007349662,0.164589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8697083,0.04757388,0.05754399,0.0006916684,0.0008109142,0.007664242,0.01309621,0.00008850839,0.002822164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1172226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.416319839601637,"score_gpt":0.5082498152440752,"score_spread":0.09192997564243816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}