{"id":"W4410578141","doi":"10.1016/j.isci.2025.112706","title":"How THC works: Explaining ligand affinity for, and partial agonism of, cannabinoid receptor 1","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"iScience","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Agonism; Cannabinoid; Chemistry; Cannabinoid receptor; Ligand (biochemistry); Receptor; Intrinsic activity; Partial agonist; Pharmacology; Neuroscience; Stereochemistry; Psychology; Biology; Antagonist; Biochemistry; Political science; Agonist","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005269318,0.0001062886,0.0002338624,0.0001427111,0.0001928476,0.0001155384,0.000154137,0.00007481997,0.0000124688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006389992,0.00008607588,0.00006519216,0.0004728814,0.0004812026,0.0001578509,0.0001130386,0.0001572588,9.673461e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004202414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004377817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003390125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988399,0.0000228565,0.0001636162,0.0003302786,0.0002887482,0.000354591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993172,0.00003328772,0.00005493212,0.000246288,0.0001929399,0.0001554089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001071618,0.0003471227,0.01690209,0.0008723156,0.0000656711,0.00002349141,0.002857855,0.000009108836,0.449986,0.01210475,0.2404103,0.2753497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002594614,0.0009416363,0.02330513,0.0006616134,0.00006074945,0.00002328574,0.002014828,0.0009296136,0.6032534,0.0008324394,0.3650973,0.0002853892],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.952602,0.002515138,0.001982777,0.04064126,0.0003640697,0.0005047041,0.0000154502,0.00002839246,0.001346212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802382,0.0001617254,0.0007679199,0.0003058884,0.0001012848,0.00008988062,0.000003570622,0.000007379175,0.01832415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3510073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02342323055341371,"score_gpt":0.3089531056471921,"score_spread":0.2855298750937784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}