{"id":"W4410612411","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.5","title":"Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Villum Fonden","keywords":"Gender bias; Inequality; Grant funding; Gender disparity; Gender inequality; Implicit bias; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3550921,0.0005533909,0.002316592,0.001454671,0.003653606,0.004436112,0.003247497,0.004169985,0.009734674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5553423,0.0006793866,0.001753961,0.002144063,0.009801284,0.005308236,0.006609745,0.003514041,0.001169159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002998142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004090913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007022657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006527964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4926848,0.4556498,0.008986243,0.01807166,0.01804296,0.006564474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2814724,0.5964705,0.05524475,0.05258459,0.01089845,0.003329384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03851981,0.004194101,0.4366826,0.002780656,0.005080744,0.002127597,0.0316339,0.006646971,0.003712061,0.3145083,0.02376824,0.130345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008987158,0.01149018,0.4326772,0.002314822,0.003613857,0.001373516,0.02100324,0.05267826,0.01238758,0.3972973,0.05536865,0.0008081897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8763463,0.00202838,0.07787041,0.01374968,0.0009666243,0.00251007,0.00155634,0.0002224296,0.02474969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896259,0.0000752198,0.006380933,0.001289386,0.0001309529,0.001078705,0.0001248986,0.00002552164,0.001268583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7952862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8238363909286305,"score_gpt":0.67728162911672,"score_spread":0.1465547618119105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}