{"id":"W4410612411","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.5","title":"Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Villum Fonden","keywords":"Gender bias; Inequality; Grant funding; Gender disparity; Gender inequality; Implicit bias; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06750784,0.0001532432,0.0004509258,0.01498858,0.0008353671,0.0004925784,0.002584122,0.0000290726,0.00002455161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08367249,0.00006579304,0.0001176683,0.2165027,0.003300309,0.0005949016,0.001934801,0.000298556,0.00001183679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002424557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000405846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007070712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001439672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915592,0.0005220213,0.0009059036,0.0007382773,0.00567343,0.0006011322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857699,0.00692983,0.0003276367,0.0008408871,0.006049092,0.00008259846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004112056,0.0008086622,0.5268908,0.0003266991,0.0001108413,0.0001821226,0.03363011,0.0004290024,0.005078502,0.3795306,0.03702138,0.01558011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004723993,0.0002774251,0.6470588,0.001286332,0.00003623436,0.00002956979,0.247664,0.00642241,0.01845709,0.06518506,0.008277182,0.000581865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178084,0.06145019,0.000174494,0.01466116,0.0008561141,0.0009526776,0.00001024435,0.000004165628,0.004082614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994964,0.003812604,0.0001858348,0.0002801308,0.000005769087,0.00007084658,1.470724e-7,0.000002454376,0.0006781802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3143455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8238363909286305,"score_gpt":0.67728162911672,"score_spread":0.1465547618119105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}