{"id":"W4410837966","doi":"10.22541/au.174840484.47359201/v1","title":"Comparative analysis of GFN methods in geometry optimization of small organic semiconductor molecules: A DFT benchmarking study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Semiconductor materials and devices","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS","keywords":"Benchmarking; Semiconductor; Materials science; Molecule; Geometry; Nanotechnology; Computational chemistry; Mathematics; Chemistry; Organic chemistry; Optoelectronics; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006482055,0.0003520612,0.001718572,0.002380084,0.00001218251,0.00003592293,0.0003842236,0.0002579849,0.0008455003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005553581,0.0003457087,0.0001966971,0.002508565,0.00002890787,0.00005784932,0.0003764167,0.0002675107,3.937638e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001054638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007378768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007827888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004858771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977984,0.0002889539,0.001122057,0.0004355566,0.0001667283,0.0001883442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986149,0.0002843266,0.0003266721,0.0005516549,0.0001839353,0.00003847924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008698201,0.0001219587,0.004778946,0.0005359098,0.002657688,7.61777e-7,0.002518277,0.8623193,0.1269689,0.00002299753,0.000007572796,0.00005901846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003968988,0.00005496154,0.004888886,0.0002979997,0.002226048,2.182284e-7,0.003624439,0.7558137,0.2321932,0.00003351977,0.000007786316,0.0004623245],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9101458,0.001014885,0.08595128,0.000001048372,0.0005026159,0.0005325221,0.0001232322,0.00008091598,0.001647684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8783055,0.0001154652,0.1213228,0.000008834082,0.00002546688,0.0000352223,0.0001417245,0.00001871953,0.00002633833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1065055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04419907634978658,"score_gpt":0.3413113711958068,"score_spread":0.2971122948460202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}