{"id":"W4410873139","doi":"10.1080/17549175.2025.2508792","title":"Pedestrianizing strategies and street liveliness: a case study of Montreal (Canada)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"High Street; Walkability; Advertising; Environmental planning; Economic geography; Aesthetics; Business; Geography; Civil engineering; Engineering; Art; Built environment; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001146004,0.0007468965,0.0005071445,0.002012514,0.02102651,0.003521815,0.002281904,0.001733177,0.0052442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002746492,0.0004549641,0.0004375477,0.004616945,0.004326847,0.001026769,0.002543706,0.001627104,0.0003203529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05203805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985759,0.0003861831,0.00002598898,0.0001337974,0.0002280724,0.0006500314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983968,0.0002917889,0.0001458013,0.00005137874,0.0004501236,0.0006641118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002131816,0.0008168867,0.1912729,0.0005907384,0.0001014679,0.0314256,0.6803253,0.001326837,0.002311553,0.01436021,0.02067824,0.05657706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003308048,0.0002100255,0.174831,0.0003850078,0.0000714263,0.001353726,0.757435,0.001036988,0.0004521589,0.0005641179,0.06350825,0.0001192076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822296,0.001048838,0.0003390167,0.002361015,0.00003263762,0.000184571,0.000544391,0.00001736673,0.0132425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871033,0.001270013,0.0008504399,0.0006107121,0.00001232335,0.00008008669,0.000202859,0.00002192047,0.009848342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.086964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6309709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05034422755777283,"score_gpt":0.4190592473452076,"score_spread":0.3687150197874347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}