{"id":"W4410873139","doi":"10.1080/17549175.2025.2508792","title":"Pedestrianizing strategies and street liveliness: a case study of Montreal (Canada)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"High Street; Walkability; Advertising; Environmental planning; Economic geography; Aesthetics; Business; Geography; Civil engineering; Engineering; Art; Built environment; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005131399,0.0001314573,0.0003217917,0.0003995124,0.0006179895,0.0002856388,0.0003344606,0.00008470337,0.00001959995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003033743,0.0001127534,0.00005410836,0.000404419,0.0004928753,0.0005295567,0.0001008458,0.0006728132,2.700348e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006691786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004242922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4508695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5767474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966398,0.000806871,0.0006634105,0.000284253,0.00129738,0.0003082803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948256,0.001793052,0.0002963851,0.0001681178,0.002762845,0.000154008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009383794,0.001035306,0.9528958,0.0001839534,0.0001855645,0.002044166,0.01494802,0.00008477062,0.00001018133,0.02268789,0.001045914,0.003940029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001458698,0.000631891,0.2675363,0.0001460412,0.00004097634,0.00002112204,0.7135146,0.0001537038,0.00001277789,0.01510499,0.001258436,0.0001205233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940047,0.000344433,0.00009023504,0.001208629,0.0001970145,0.0003961826,0.000008322633,0.000007304945,0.00374323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991962,0.00003122172,0.00003212661,0.00001795514,0.000144139,0.000006047967,5.754291e-7,0.00000551946,0.000566237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6985666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7526761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05034422755777283,"score_gpt":0.4190592473452076,"score_spread":0.3687150197874347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}