{"id":"W4410942588","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115871","title":"Energy communities in social sciences: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Social science; Systematic review; Sociology; Management science; Regional science; Political science; Library science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002873309,0.0002553779,0.001061277,0.006968247,0.0006156811,0.0002159005,0.0003367964,0.0001098286,0.0001372045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002953651,0.0001982179,0.0001470207,0.1159193,0.0003523011,0.0004709843,0.0005274526,0.0001033181,9.508612e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002929525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004094829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01067849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004419819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974501,0.0006591591,0.0006305008,0.0004069921,0.0002499474,0.0006033019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990749,0.0002285,0.0002264747,0.0003578124,0.00004798036,0.00006437377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005718971,0.0005632279,0.0715912,0.757214,0.0004400419,0.0002520784,0.006572188,0.001175732,0.00003780312,0.07046466,0.0429497,0.0486822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007033432,0.0001416181,0.004289345,0.05077028,0.001316193,0.00002908251,0.02217489,0.002209956,0.00003622961,0.01388272,0.9034649,0.0009814261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008730941,0.9733331,0.0006998132,0.0005652938,0.00002093161,0.0004246817,0.000003528809,0.00002156709,0.01620021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06080776,0.9201711,0.00006876433,0.002727442,0.00001326569,0.0003536108,0.00001549354,0.00000739718,0.01583517],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8605152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02064331229408661,"score_gpt":0.279726118029999,"score_spread":0.2590828057359124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}