{"id":"W4411197888","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.5c00047","title":"Chemical Hazard Assessment of Vanadium–Vanadium Flow Battery Electrolytes in Failure Mode","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","topic":"Advanced battery technologies research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vanadium; Flow battery; Failure mode and effects analysis; Electrolyte; Hazard; Battery (electricity); Materials science; Metallurgy; Chemistry; Thermodynamics; Composite material; Electrode; Physics; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005346804,0.0004579414,0.000248289,0.001152898,0.0002462066,0.0005378141,0.0004498138,0.0005593416,0.001208405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007780285,0.0001532315,0.0004586131,0.0004983259,0.0001819234,0.0005221803,0.0004243374,0.0003380945,0.0003326702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002872178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002650548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001552979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001547678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996619,0.00003133037,0.00002952808,0.00004833449,0.0001869052,0.00004197075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995433,0.00008073854,0.00008259686,0.00001911118,0.0002522984,0.0000220951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001052801,0.0001569552,0.02996076,0.0006697733,0.00007637028,0.0005087214,0.0003470529,0.01158631,0.9118083,0.0003340149,0.0004305465,0.04306837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001995481,0.003907576,0.03341087,0.0000855649,0.0001252859,0.0006272441,0.0005625162,0.02070585,0.9346486,0.000477275,0.005376628,0.00005264537],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931733,0.001116273,0.00348316,0.00002204545,0.00002170153,0.00008505931,0.0004675267,0.0000606116,0.001570275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382,0.001565709,0.002162135,0.00003512552,0.000007774042,0.00007398624,0.0004990858,0.00001580507,0.001820351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001552979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004042506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00775685954923814,"score_gpt":0.309035508665321,"score_spread":0.3012786491160829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}