{"id":"W4411197888","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.5c00047","title":"Chemical Hazard Assessment of Vanadium–Vanadium Flow Battery Electrolytes in Failure Mode","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","topic":"Advanced battery technologies research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vanadium; Flow battery; Failure mode and effects analysis; Electrolyte; Hazard; Battery (electricity); Materials science; Metallurgy; Chemistry; Thermodynamics; Composite material; Electrode; Physics; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002581699,0.0002982258,0.0006563598,0.0002939812,0.0000452246,0.00001250825,0.0006358405,0.0003300218,0.00004739944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001584299,0.0003136265,0.00008488543,0.0008610623,0.0001451455,0.0001298827,0.0002275319,0.001284577,0.000007566596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001631096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003998681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009645765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002294999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972254,0.00004197843,0.0008580875,0.0004486032,0.0003351725,0.001090747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986922,0.0003532412,0.00006443964,0.0006379077,0.00006481877,0.0001873723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001501925,0.0002446315,0.004212881,0.002031976,0.0001288111,0.00002172902,0.00009076554,0.01959833,0.8648142,0.002549824,0.01847633,0.0876803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00176798,0.00007774788,0.002161912,0.0004547574,0.00001226306,0.000009608238,0.00009690641,0.1108653,0.870202,0.004818805,0.008949405,0.0005832788],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8959513,0.001332519,0.05953414,0.03511041,0.000327863,0.001508274,0.0002038244,0.001258562,0.00477307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803408,0.0004689331,0.01829284,0.0005919829,0.00003945246,0.0000904596,0.00008626269,0.00004438056,0.00004482329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.091267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00775685954923814,"score_gpt":0.309035508665321,"score_spread":0.3012786491160829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}