{"id":"W4411336020","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2319927121","title":"Unilateral incentive alignment in two-agent stochastic games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic game; Adversary; Generalization; Computer science; Incentive; Fictitious play; Proxy (statistics); Mathematical economics; Face (sociological concept); Multi-agent system; Mathematical optimization; Zero (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Game theory; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Machine learning; Economics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004339853,0.0007008948,0.001245051,0.0005266382,0.001011427,0.002014586,0.001453293,0.001834326,0.001821994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01495334,0.0005440675,0.0006592746,0.0004760031,0.002687764,0.002632723,0.002430218,0.001691315,0.0002131114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001595893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001972324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001770107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001764058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952821,0.002824368,0.0002197273,0.0005890973,0.0006609051,0.0004238242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928271,0.00465525,0.001102536,0.0004207192,0.000325787,0.0006684972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001290068,0.0001206359,0.001679692,0.0000944881,0.00006892188,0.0002772069,0.0003480339,0.3473838,0.001600337,0.6328997,0.0005849199,0.01481331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005950616,0.00006998466,0.0003708867,0.00001295271,0.0000128896,0.00005696249,0.00006009178,0.7173996,0.0003512312,0.2804952,0.001088694,0.0000219883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.147182,0.0001623673,0.8379137,0.001338344,0.00005553545,0.0001684104,0.00006972325,0.0001285262,0.0129814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521298,0.0001066406,0.04473288,0.0001387972,0.00002909558,0.0001811649,0.00003003134,0.00001739846,0.002634237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004339853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02295166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02820166894267606,"score_gpt":0.3500530111423329,"score_spread":0.3218513421996568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}