{"id":"W4411349279","doi":"10.11124/jbies-24-00523","title":"The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for analytical cross-sectional studies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JBI Evidence Synthesis","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Observational study; Systematic review; Cross-sectional study; Context (archaeology); Population; Psychology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Environmental health; Geography; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6007207,0.008819387,0.01696526,0.04626248,0.005424743,0.02044169,0.0116305,0.01200961,0.03060977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8571964,0.007992761,0.03648626,0.03510763,0.01160717,0.01342202,0.01617278,0.02621062,0.01167864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02035336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06564763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003614177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004481993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2035539,0.5464477,0.1837036,0.00935721,0.05403561,0.00290198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06849721,0.6558541,0.06674168,0.03180671,0.1742156,0.002884782],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003936553,0.0002226484,0.003155465,0.2606985,0.0168333,0.0004722104,0.006132698,0.005097792,0.00191587,0.04072472,0.3057379,0.3550723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009710333,0.001108367,0.007675984,0.2462376,0.01794054,0.001805784,0.002661027,0.02894278,0.00544059,0.1167598,0.5587994,0.002917633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001768269,0.03306465,0.6784462,0.03209451,0.02838245,0.1880734,0.01805745,0.008737609,0.01137545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005227297,0.003693314,0.8166765,0.002601648,0.001247454,0.1672828,0.001603168,0.000767439,0.000900284],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3992793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4923825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5949783865453533,"score_gpt":0.621226203132536,"score_spread":0.02624781658718267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}