{"id":"W4411349279","doi":"10.11124/jbies-24-00523","title":"The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for analytical cross-sectional studies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JBI Evidence Synthesis","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Observational study; Systematic review; Cross-sectional study; Context (archaeology); Population; Psychology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Environmental health; Geography; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1875366,0.0002560773,0.002624071,0.0001987454,0.0006949429,0.0006541589,0.00212473,0.0000937162,0.0004304667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8451535,0.00009202513,0.003207565,0.001056875,0.0008186928,0.0002400577,0.000206291,0.0001373704,0.00002116835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005296465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002711534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008451309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001544549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808225,0.006700166,0.007752224,0.0008186218,0.003589418,0.0003170789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1663725,0.8212439,0.00350027,0.003384215,0.005431626,0.00006743846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002082995,0.0001747923,0.7027047,0.001373912,0.003872353,4.889844e-7,0.0002505045,0.0005890367,0.0001264516,0.1746385,0.0673768,0.04868412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002445253,0.0001252891,0.8025835,0.0007782085,0.00428506,0.000002450491,0.002384993,0.1155249,0.0004553106,0.02726763,0.04609364,0.0002545111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.130445,0.01697023,0.8204151,0.02146222,0.003014594,0.006161203,0.0004744779,0.00001665965,0.001040516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849097,0.0006200995,0.01175749,0.00007787147,0.0001420452,0.00104425,4.773215e-7,0.000009004597,0.00143909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8366021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5949783865453533,"score_gpt":0.621226203132536,"score_spread":0.02624781658718267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}