{"id":"W4411446132","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07952","title":"A systematic review evaluating the performance of eDNA methods relative to conventional methods for biodiversity monitoring","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Species richness; CLARITY; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00482346,0.0004020802,0.001872027,0.0001618516,0.0006018111,0.00001545268,0.0008553166,0.0001264053,0.0001267592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009693746,0.0002800798,0.001282386,0.001073534,0.0004827068,0.0001342245,0.001023608,0.0002945005,0.0001155135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002682198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000139207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001064488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.588527e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959944,0.001947723,0.0008404391,0.0005590877,0.0003686213,0.0002897635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953539,0.003176806,0.0008244266,0.0005500441,0.00002599673,0.00006887614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005858015,0.00004640907,0.001689404,0.7921309,0.0009683396,2.088661e-7,0.0001803472,0.000005542955,0.000004453091,0.000009615032,0.001182439,0.2037764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000284299,0.0005871278,0.001289882,0.8399528,0.01971138,0.000005628973,0.0002524159,0.00003171917,0.00006594383,0.00008988482,0.1367738,0.000955122],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002593657,0.9897803,0.003796604,0.00004135035,0.0003900293,0.005578567,0.000143802,0.00002167098,0.0002217109],"genre_scores_gemma":[4.139131e-7,0.7448,0.2543349,0.00006196016,0.00001158033,0.0005535415,0.00001636938,0.000007146387,0.0002140693],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2505383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09121869459910735,"score_gpt":0.4328872639162502,"score_spread":0.3416685693171428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}