{"id":"W4411461193","doi":"10.1111/cag.70018","title":"Community‐appropriate bioenergy resource potential assessment in Pelican Narrows, Saskatchewan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Renewable energy; Bioenergy; Indigenous; Local community; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental economics; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007520546,0.0002240061,0.0002011008,0.001012527,0.002947133,0.00146215,0.0006606838,0.0002252359,0.003848199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001347357,0.0002139822,0.0001479059,0.002150317,0.0009683112,0.0005732969,0.001583642,0.0003486972,0.0002412551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01456425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01768768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.918429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995975,0.0001136694,0.00001692886,0.00006422057,0.00009585825,0.0001119308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989253,0.0002480928,0.00006956378,0.00007724007,0.0005115352,0.0001682478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000420688,0.0003361937,0.7204788,0.0005305416,0.0001735616,0.003325976,0.07838729,0.005918592,0.01744928,0.008369927,0.006943891,0.1576652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002102114,0.0001246781,0.6769382,0.0002234806,0.00005810664,0.0002471951,0.2814891,0.003649765,0.002909419,0.00215457,0.03210973,0.00007477673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792404,0.0001265785,0.001190735,0.0003367125,0.000006058567,0.0002450561,0.001017316,0.000018536,0.01781855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912317,0.0001977326,0.002007916,0.0001007551,8.720591e-7,0.0001984732,0.0003778946,0.000006210245,0.005878394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08157104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1641028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007978304782160842,"score_gpt":0.2420390471830575,"score_spread":0.2340607424008966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}