{"id":"W4411472132","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6880886/v1","title":"eDNA adoption: Weighting the benefits and challenges from Quebec potential end-users’ perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Endangered species; End user; Weighting; Wildlife; Perspective (graphical); Perception; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Business; Knowledge management; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Fishery; Psychology; Ecology; Biology; World Wide Web; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01716557,0.0005409698,0.0004892395,0.002536737,0.005071395,0.01252379,0.001724421,0.00262323,0.01013487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03256441,0.0002712221,0.0005944686,0.005090326,0.003866152,0.004641225,0.003131267,0.00226647,0.000607071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07554532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06696323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9452728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9765204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9829931,0.005247251,0.0003721812,0.001304313,0.00701835,0.003064888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510628,0.01169652,0.001768995,0.001410877,0.03119923,0.002861584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00123208,0.0002614578,0.3096737,0.001292231,0.0004124796,0.001973415,0.01596707,0.007364272,0.009564586,0.1519083,0.08015972,0.4201907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001323671,0.0004510541,0.4149876,0.002998664,0.0007413322,0.0009795119,0.07508826,0.01860659,0.009030388,0.02416076,0.4523994,0.0004241123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4095095,0.01262835,0.01546412,0.1402856,0.0005829492,0.0004867023,0.005969576,0.0002621436,0.414811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646615,0.003161712,0.006525837,0.00705168,0.00006175209,0.00009051565,0.000647088,0.00006694413,0.01773296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07554532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5481222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06132071822094031,"score_gpt":0.302406801777433,"score_spread":0.2410860835564927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}