{"id":"W4411495984","doi":"10.1111/conl.13110","title":"Resolving Uncertainties in the Legality of Wildlife Trade to Support Better Outcomes for Wildlife and People","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"A.G. Leventis Foundation; University of Oxford; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Wildlife trade; Wildlife; Business; CLARITY; Livelihood; Sustainability; Principle of legality; Enforcement; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Compromise; Stakeholder; Traceability; Economics; Geography; Political science; Agriculture; Ecology; Public relations; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03283766,0.0004389384,0.0005396426,0.002376208,0.007159405,0.01487747,0.002600097,0.005365632,0.01662124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1004317,0.0004427122,0.0005536049,0.00173535,0.016815,0.01774677,0.01146312,0.004816666,0.0008842575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008736799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01573678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008203343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01272474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9797458,0.01192372,0.00127188,0.001511397,0.00343836,0.002108898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8934874,0.06794395,0.01668252,0.007775325,0.01039566,0.003715151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252507,0.0003049269,0.04967834,0.0006107921,0.0000841685,0.001127013,0.01863516,0.0132202,0.001376858,0.7973043,0.009896476,0.1076364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002200183,0.00008765735,0.01142719,0.001718696,0.00004768202,0.0002949528,0.03179352,0.008865528,0.001180686,0.8764265,0.06803533,0.0001002358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3201132,0.003814125,0.1408971,0.1719187,0.0007072062,0.0004157962,0.0004306211,0.0002314088,0.3614718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877078,0.0006022884,0.007825346,0.002039409,0.00009016598,0.00008348245,0.00006803379,0.00002286383,0.001560524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03283766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1736642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01640608519584378,"score_gpt":0.256832739798093,"score_spread":0.2404266546022492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}