{"id":"W4411508607","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09423-x","title":"Laughing at Law: A Case for Comic Jurisprudence in the Climate Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Harm; Indigenous; Shame; Laughter; Political science; Comparative law; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007375929,0.00006006386,0.0000927731,0.000002329103,0.001326978,0.0001257026,0.000135427,0.0001136793,0.00001466173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003066604,0.00004414392,0.00005091646,0.00008998434,0.0002446048,0.0001332668,0.00003844305,0.0001136948,0.000001495566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000355596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002080129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006785161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1068103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993176,0.0001477864,0.0000984982,0.0001392887,0.0000775706,0.0002192912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994872,0.000347634,0.00001644355,0.00008934704,0.00003289012,0.00002643844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006971408,0.00001588172,0.00009834654,0.00004248764,0.000003534059,0.00003551767,0.02567084,3.994783e-7,0.000022861,0.9656643,0.00839884,0.00004000299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003435767,0.00001718256,0.00004806376,0.00007020045,0.00002737101,0.00002500967,0.07619208,0.00001459852,0.0002086069,0.1242436,0.7986816,0.0001281025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3624862,0.00366328,0.0002484994,0.1240321,0.000425855,0.001160084,0.00008680885,0.000116471,0.5077807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700477,0.0006705174,0.0001450137,0.02833509,0.00005655558,0.00008276894,0.000002182984,0.000002905414,0.0006572967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8414208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01307478135513996,"score_gpt":0.3488230587474624,"score_spread":0.3357482773923225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}