{"id":"W4411530960","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12390","title":"Assessing differential impacts of a trade agreement using a quantile regression approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Korea University","keywords":"Revenue; Quantile regression; Agriculture; Differential (mechanical device); Economics; Panel data; Profit (economics); Agricultural economics; Free trade agreement; International economics; International trade; Econometrics; Free trade; Geography; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00705485,0.000356116,0.0006134687,0.0009071693,0.000302196,0.001329542,0.0009442641,0.0009103222,0.006730336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01372173,0.0002220206,0.001361964,0.001852956,0.0004146943,0.0006601205,0.001017623,0.001819358,0.0006512725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008555517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004512169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01760773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00616606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966215,0.002068655,0.000132514,0.0004624141,0.0003566479,0.0003582954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831583,0.01102422,0.003696726,0.001012606,0.0007467485,0.0003612905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005992051,0.0005282963,0.6855572,0.000153634,0.001957528,0.0004377294,0.0003605581,0.2573208,0.002352834,0.01248518,0.003589651,0.03465736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007423248,0.0005445561,0.5963975,0.00004911763,0.0003685723,0.00007370139,0.0007785409,0.3907595,0.001246828,0.006055686,0.003606804,0.00004495215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613757,0.0004138302,0.02921431,0.0007267547,0.00004986238,0.0001120994,0.002874175,0.0001929015,0.005040352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972172,0.00006662412,0.0009349886,0.00004992811,0.00002415946,0.00003513263,0.0008999436,0.00001024296,0.0007618357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01760773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03731006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07570087750918543,"score_gpt":0.2115425529559173,"score_spread":0.1358416754467318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}