{"id":"W4411661391","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2025.1487503","title":"Climate change and forestry carbon sink: a literature review and visualization perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Climate change; Perspective (graphical); Carbon sink; Forestry; Visualization; Sink (geography); Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Cartography; Data mining; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005518543,0.0006035328,0.0009021612,0.07335603,0.001277264,0.005092534,0.0007162236,0.001145249,0.002344846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01286195,0.0002824676,0.001213135,0.08861917,0.0009873558,0.005660282,0.001457362,0.0005930538,0.0002580952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003053489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009303914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005387748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01191381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977373,0.0008289477,0.0004285617,0.0001872146,0.0006823863,0.0001356083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880651,0.008370614,0.001391235,0.0001795246,0.001794583,0.000199039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001836865,0.0001275108,0.03987397,0.08400147,0.001024226,0.00214285,0.008340855,0.003176203,0.003369523,0.06878816,0.04000846,0.7489631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005571374,0.0002950333,0.1541672,0.1272974,0.003867527,0.003870466,0.04553662,0.008312794,0.002490922,0.04606454,0.6077892,0.0002525776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03389605,0.9271437,0.004972619,0.01640033,0.0008889079,0.0001631083,0.001737933,0.0001249827,0.01467226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2096328,0.7774491,0.008388354,0.001411562,0.000865997,0.0002013221,0.00102539,0.00001899761,0.001006469],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07335603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02918518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02318116957398133,"score_gpt":0.3146358331493118,"score_spread":0.2914546635753305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}