{"id":"W4411666073","doi":"10.1016/j.identj.2025.100871","title":"Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Dental Journal","topic":"Dental materials and restorations","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Amalgam (chemistry); Medicine; Dentistry; Relative risk; Systematic review; Confidence interval; Observational study; Publication bias; MEDLINE; Resin composite; Internal medicine; Composite number; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007750809,0.0003669991,0.003896653,0.00072563,0.0001886148,0.0004762994,0.0004621666,0.0001726781,0.0004748313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003433537,0.0002465319,0.001733189,0.0004434915,0.00009780277,0.0002655298,0.0002328237,0.0004126713,0.00003373917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009147926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000474459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001977079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962499,0.0008478797,0.001868798,0.0003103326,0.0005957717,0.0001273416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967895,0.0003317196,0.002178072,0.0002988134,0.0002907838,0.0001111399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009931528,0.0001439054,0.00008803196,0.6513754,0.3435072,0.0002308013,0.00003019903,0.000003917686,0.000005831763,0.0009658634,0.003098688,0.0005402536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001562071,0.00002210105,0.0000817223,0.05608849,0.92344,0.003183493,0.00003265424,0.000005616335,0.000001199092,0.0001188774,0.01660524,0.0002643344],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003914101,0.9965985,0.0001550966,0.00009504489,0.0004520037,0.0008330604,0.001631561,0.00001286462,0.0001827524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002077463,0.9962534,0.0003994391,0.00006919814,0.0000714218,0.0001000248,0.0002180281,0.00001972529,0.002661024],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5952869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03698323661975833,"score_gpt":0.363250859667357,"score_spread":0.3262676230475987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}