{"id":"W4411666073","doi":"10.1016/j.identj.2025.100871","title":"Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Dental Journal","topic":"Dental materials and restorations","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Amalgam (chemistry); Medicine; Dentistry; Relative risk; Systematic review; Confidence interval; Observational study; Publication bias; MEDLINE; Resin composite; Internal medicine; Composite number; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02960276,0.004360593,0.02571406,0.01386898,0.0009160666,0.004616973,0.002871732,0.003274815,0.0027084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0521418,0.002706528,0.06958393,0.008412782,0.0009235647,0.002712589,0.002125814,0.002236545,0.0002652088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003722479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005145007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004263102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008628015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9736677,0.01268616,0.006865595,0.002389135,0.003830059,0.0005613248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691662,0.0207418,0.005949742,0.0009651698,0.002813358,0.0003637736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001845611,0.00004841986,0.003606223,0.2840875,0.699123,0.0001455447,0.00008367805,0.0006285143,0.0002106267,0.0001139892,0.0002818036,0.00982502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005637194,0.0003321781,0.003229987,0.02667735,0.9674511,0.0001636012,0.00005679783,0.0002476176,0.0001528459,0.0001584952,0.0009329051,0.00003344639],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005080155,0.9932187,0.0006477173,0.0001532957,0.0001456855,0.0003537298,0.0002490646,0.00001786744,0.0001337156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1855087,0.8042989,0.005056944,0.0008258664,0.0004936159,0.002754051,0.000670333,0.00003671415,0.000354853],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02960276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1565562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03698323661975833,"score_gpt":0.363250859667357,"score_spread":0.3262676230475987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}