{"id":"W4411738562","doi":"10.1177/01925121251344943","title":"Institutional disruption and women’s substantive representation: the Senate of Canada as a case study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005300642,0.00064964,0.0007972468,0.003858766,0.0715979,0.009502192,0.002949315,0.003496211,0.004922391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008576152,0.0004912407,0.0005278408,0.009714067,0.02289977,0.002465525,0.007586735,0.004176431,0.0003280362],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.174294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.191008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892062,0.003423835,0.0001955405,0.0007058788,0.00209777,0.004370822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922151,0.002339154,0.0006338761,0.000398297,0.002541053,0.001872571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047365,0.0001162822,0.04269128,0.0002704005,0.00004525143,0.008719547,0.7714137,0.0006665095,0.001045429,0.1236946,0.02473123,0.02650102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001338182,0.0000335945,0.02460792,0.0002759317,0.00003094003,0.0006467363,0.8026826,0.0002733881,0.0004627845,0.001990221,0.168902,0.00008051481],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8079852,0.004092424,0.001309151,0.02594326,0.000263196,0.0003193216,0.0008487094,0.00003788301,0.1592008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799901,0.001552978,0.0006706922,0.00206555,0.00002987427,0.00009260095,0.0001676603,0.00003102708,0.01539964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8257059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9577019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0400202278265348,"score_gpt":0.4242662338848423,"score_spread":0.3842460060583075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}