{"id":"W4411800607","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004805","title":"The political economy of tobacco of Zimbabwe: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLOS Global Public Health","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Tobacco industry; Tobacco control; Cultivation of tobacco; Business; Government (linguistics); Commodity; Poverty; Stakeholder; Economic growth; Political science; Agriculture; Public health; Economics; Public relations; Geography; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004920682,0.00009858076,0.0003154989,0.00006182412,0.00009153794,0.0000141206,0.0003242477,0.00005135768,0.0003258319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001227273,0.000073619,0.00009729408,0.0007880573,0.000504791,0.0002101203,0.0001235453,0.0000650899,0.000003246779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005274396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001426228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001858904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008656092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985287,0.0001738759,0.0004074029,0.0002173122,0.0002425293,0.0004301443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990316,0.00009534119,0.0001808242,0.0004277907,0.00001628833,0.0002481508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000203968,0.0008990111,0.3955097,0.00002355912,0.0004811649,2.379637e-7,0.0004620285,0.001878757,0.00006945468,0.5966346,0.0004487399,0.003572401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002241022,0.0001735386,0.984975,0.000009508138,0.00009826965,2.72584e-7,0.005215287,0.0007370461,0.0002177128,0.005682238,0.002583616,0.00008334296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9022523,0.0001574328,0.0002049325,0.01373207,0.00002065164,0.00011581,0.00006433597,0.00001049815,0.083442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988024,0.00003488992,0.0001713649,0.0009130907,0.000006859487,0.000003849663,0.000009323123,0.00000295605,0.00005530149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5909523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3567631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04454008829140373,"score_gpt":0.2953816716176214,"score_spread":0.2508415833262176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}