{"id":"W4411935279","doi":"10.1097/hp.0000000000002004","title":"Evaluation of an Unusual Contamination Event Using Monte Carlo Simulations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Physics","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Contamination; Imaging phantom; Whole body counting; Event (particle physics); Counting efficiency; Radioactive contamination; Environmental science; Medical physics; Detector; Computer science; Nuclear medicine; Nuclear engineering; Simulation; Statistics; Nuclear physics; Medicine; Physics; Radionuclide; Mathematics; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005926334,0.00005347856,0.0001450533,0.00007829406,0.00008440777,0.000005582319,0.00002180335,0.00002206123,0.000006713301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008875148,0.00005643851,0.0000291609,0.0002638599,0.00001462975,0.0001608972,0.000006376495,0.00006246015,9.5069e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003344941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009755199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002416106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002556138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990333,0.0001450721,0.0002496256,0.0001061573,0.0003674794,0.00009837589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992,0.00003479751,0.0001369212,0.0001496388,0.0004320151,0.00004660154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003062825,0.0004271007,0.009864432,0.0002479848,0.00007823559,3.121169e-7,0.002205741,0.2817677,0.002683905,0.00204199,0.0001855789,0.7004664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001052407,0.000070325,0.05594131,0.0001211907,0.0001273505,4.759736e-7,0.0001823244,0.9393601,0.002347085,0.0006287259,0.000134192,0.00003449963],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840491,0.0002299844,0.01395803,0.0007194688,0.0001352278,0.0005079841,0.000008753792,0.00001860381,0.0003728386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998789,0.000007262594,0.0003730756,0.0006342956,0.0001017335,0.000005416735,0.0000386192,0.000006296022,0.00004432747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2301496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1030083448115378,"score_gpt":0.4832088852521492,"score_spread":0.3802005404406114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}