{"id":"W4412031376","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102648","title":"Approaches to incorporating equity into program evaluation: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Participatory evaluation; Equity (law); Program evaluation; Oppression; Social justice; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Politics; Social science; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08697104,0.002250124,0.006998021,0.02808531,0.001734266,0.008614391,0.003535139,0.004544392,0.004062819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2031077,0.001724142,0.004963269,0.0236579,0.003374888,0.008006762,0.005549219,0.004407261,0.0005952609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01281783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05075446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01864045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04259057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9621293,0.01773103,0.009486868,0.001540488,0.008395001,0.0007173195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8188493,0.1490199,0.009639894,0.002709779,0.0186344,0.001146773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001053485,0.00007251913,0.000552278,0.3644712,0.002045144,0.00007563108,0.0005746519,0.0005455669,0.0001788163,0.01084305,0.01063334,0.6099025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006911216,0.00007957727,0.001018863,0.8802735,0.005970257,0.0001471679,0.0004621388,0.0003233624,0.000236742,0.00836727,0.1030028,0.00004927122],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009660417,0.9957877,0.00116596,0.001795337,0.0002747903,0.0002172831,0.0000588184,0.000009327917,0.0005941562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001995744,0.9924781,0.003943665,0.0009059939,0.0001420802,0.0003495122,0.00005372071,0.000006917056,0.0001242744],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.913029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4599523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8271630226958828,"score_gpt":0.689856398152968,"score_spread":0.1373066245429149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}