{"id":"W4412031376","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102648","title":"Approaches to incorporating equity into program evaluation: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Participatory evaluation; Equity (law); Program evaluation; Oppression; Social justice; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Politics; Social science; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06818065,0.0007215147,0.00233834,0.001035936,0.0007315546,0.001559876,0.001008028,0.0003522494,0.000909184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01172764,0.0005422261,0.0004225978,0.003936895,0.0001068683,0.0006282578,0.0008329042,0.0006053926,0.0002141281],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004286147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006359755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006545602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003241429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832255,0.004326816,0.003184059,0.001701391,0.006996226,0.0005659889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930168,0.001975008,0.001856491,0.001112225,0.001689491,0.0003499739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004559404,0.00009403403,0.00003893163,0.03589276,0.00005705032,9.168263e-7,0.0002873447,0.0001315548,1.672009e-8,0.0001970703,0.00132582,0.9619699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003986573,0.0003364524,0.000030709,0.4507928,0.001642578,0.00001392638,0.0001800243,0.0363514,2.412383e-7,0.001931937,0.5076576,0.0006636109],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003930209,0.9451815,0.0007145882,0.0007698837,0.0005445146,0.03670886,0.000009111358,0.0002359489,0.0158316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000453522,0.9404581,0.02388062,0.0005893104,0.0002703092,0.03369202,0.0007332078,0.00003790718,0.0002931546],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8271630226958828,"score_gpt":0.689856398152968,"score_spread":0.1373066245429149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}