{"id":"W4412149669","doi":"10.1177/03631990251355882","title":"Book Review: <i>Family and Justice in the Archives: Historical Perspectives on Intimacy and the Law</i> by Gossage Peter and Moore Lisa, eds. PeterGossageLisaMoore, eds. 2024. <i>Family and Justice in the Archives: Historical Perspectives on Intimacy and the Law</i> . Montreal: Concordia University Press. 442 pp. $64.95 (Paperback), ISBN: 9781988111438.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family History","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Family law; Law; Criminology; Gender studies; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006513927,0.001929654,0.00254661,0.004271294,0.001062328,0.005201123,0.002193782,0.002516719,0.09538255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00237314,0.0008152362,0.0008665411,0.01210983,0.001155607,0.004786957,0.001493664,0.003385994,0.0608913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002413691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004985715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01458633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03027105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993698,0.00008567682,0.00005802825,0.00008234509,0.0003399198,0.00006430907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998171,0.0007218399,0.000167916,0.00005012373,0.0006962586,0.0001929438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001672237,0.00001550917,0.00006103362,0.002590982,0.00001158705,0.00004021339,0.00007867657,0.00004044033,0.00005901483,0.001077129,0.9096361,0.08637249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006135486,0.0000111751,0.0004031017,0.003259738,0.00001103638,0.0002170512,0.0001147587,0.00001471258,0.00002181156,0.0004316843,0.9955,0.000008786624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007678444,0.9713466,0.0001016249,0.004270276,0.006628045,0.00001736768,0.0002285504,0.00003900058,0.01729186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009189565,0.9333823,0.0002321825,0.00270664,0.004809042,0.00004242356,0.0004796183,0.00004266172,0.05738617],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09538255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3190864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01638315266330322,"score_gpt":0.2545675750757848,"score_spread":0.2381844224124816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}