{"id":"W4412270705","doi":"","title":"Book review: A Game of Chinese Chess. Kun Fan “Arbitration in China: A Legal and Cultural Analysis” Oxford, 2013. 366 s.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; China; Advertising; History; Media studies; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00102123,0.001487848,0.001120663,0.004841186,0.001557076,0.002782741,0.001875313,0.003011113,0.03254938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003941594,0.0005125341,0.0005017563,0.007821319,0.001651725,0.003261307,0.0009955519,0.002785896,0.007588617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006666762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008614961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07107247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2002831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992996,0.000154887,0.00005471064,0.0000919843,0.000321383,0.00007739682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979687,0.0009168732,0.0001290034,0.00003972307,0.0007750289,0.0001705696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000125669,0.000007653794,0.00006891246,0.0004843077,0.000007989827,0.00002087409,0.00004667673,0.00005459269,0.00001913269,0.002378911,0.970227,0.02667127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001522415,0.00001799239,0.001291863,0.001142363,0.00001334155,0.00006793657,0.0001101946,0.00007206151,0.00005434018,0.001745951,0.9954548,0.00001386405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003343355,0.9171738,0.0001392349,0.04519386,0.0150029,0.00002769615,0.0004267591,0.00003345812,0.02166805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01126932,0.832719,0.0003488368,0.03042744,0.01667785,0.000104843,0.00097948,0.00009311727,0.1073801],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07107247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1413175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01621905281576614,"score_gpt":0.2993024600291095,"score_spread":0.2830834072133434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}