{"id":"W4412303345","doi":"","title":"Best practice methods for evaluating and monitoring archaeological human bone diagenesis – a Danish example","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"iNano Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Danish; Diagenesis; Archaeology; Human bone; History; Geology; Biology; Paleontology; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0415158,0.001501265,0.001430044,0.009440414,0.002330498,0.008587584,0.004360049,0.004015856,0.002893439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06219804,0.001089971,0.001117185,0.006638496,0.003029093,0.002550189,0.005082573,0.001412273,0.001652924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004599039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00874307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05010821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1102806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9577546,0.01664965,0.005772565,0.0048907,0.01381878,0.001113699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471983,0.01537512,0.0051858,0.01049338,0.02097861,0.0007687265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000495622,0.0003587527,0.09745572,0.003648089,0.0006775996,0.001023545,0.01088132,0.01475858,0.0120921,0.03525566,0.01067088,0.8126821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004149186,0.001402545,0.169675,0.01019528,0.002424853,0.007375211,0.03938223,0.06563433,0.0749225,0.1655303,0.4619511,0.001091718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.06508334,0.01690968,0.8661199,0.005078445,0.0005445564,0.001471705,0.00219831,0.0008758593,0.04171833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21854,0.005634339,0.7691596,0.0002367389,0.00004831843,0.0004505574,0.0007825332,0.000144739,0.00500316],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05010821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2195593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3536963211287996,"score_gpt":0.4790243981363018,"score_spread":0.1253280770075022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}