{"id":"W4412324549","doi":"","title":"Comments and suggestions for the Scientists' committee report \"Code of practice for the care and handling of mink: review of scientific research on priority issues. The Canadian Federal Government, Dept. of Agriculture, National Farm Animal Care Council, Code Development Committee.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code of practice; Government (linguistics); Code (set theory); Library science; Mink; Agriculture; Political science; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Archaeology; Programming language; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02713069,0.001363448,0.001113501,0.002879363,0.004461653,0.004239485,0.003229137,0.01042026,0.03686494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1183292,0.0007914994,0.001671102,0.003464187,0.001853377,0.003014525,0.002766805,0.01239539,0.02170084],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01048075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02822133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06591858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07459042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795619,0.004937089,0.002456779,0.001571572,0.009928435,0.00154419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7510152,0.02472811,0.006669194,0.004359811,0.2043653,0.008862309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002561732,0.00001158276,0.00009990875,0.00004796321,0.000003176501,0.00003765358,0.0001292762,0.00002628707,0.0001317452,0.000198029,0.9965394,0.002749475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001856958,0.00002211452,0.001055826,0.0001537708,0.00002081381,0.00002758745,0.0006118801,0.0001172955,0.0004571918,0.0003363362,0.9971414,0.00003704693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001627578,0.001768349,0.004607114,0.7573769,0.2113185,0.00127578,0.005150071,0.0006985195,0.01617727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015215,0.004483475,0.01266109,0.6091252,0.06352943,0.002671255,0.006116859,0.001594429,0.2846033],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1434825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2757202824373769,"score_gpt":0.4279339004753973,"score_spread":0.1522136180380204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}