{"id":"W4412488047","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71064","title":"Methodological Shortcomings in Meta‐Analysis of Wood Dust Exposure and Laryngeal Cancer","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Cancer Medicine","topic":"Head and Neck Cancer Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Environmental science; Environmental health; Medicine; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2570216,0.003248248,0.01208037,0.007014798,0.001219837,0.006570279,0.006842034,0.006545907,0.004338961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6204021,0.002637115,0.01553899,0.0099064,0.002552025,0.006344318,0.003934114,0.01000625,0.0009429703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003508251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005139833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004222997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005453962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6918183,0.2237443,0.04960794,0.01152258,0.02234901,0.0009578622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4405375,0.5082095,0.02101164,0.0174744,0.01189776,0.0008692536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004043603,0.00007853723,0.0136023,0.2616833,0.3926228,0.00156331,0.001932703,0.0044661,0.0005791702,0.01864778,0.1663058,0.1344747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004271357,0.0008403622,0.01429468,0.1783924,0.3657256,0.002389608,0.0008340642,0.01079751,0.001722089,0.1621545,0.257649,0.0009288483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002737522,0.760325,0.05170926,0.145257,0.03337306,0.0009341637,0.003513831,0.0006336923,0.001516372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2206971,0.317548,0.1187539,0.2539108,0.07126135,0.009604521,0.003354858,0.002080363,0.002789028],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7429785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9162247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.260687878170471,"score_gpt":0.4374911746584785,"score_spread":0.1768032964880075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}