{"id":"W4412723417","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2025.2535366","title":"Gender homogeneity in philosophy and methodology of economics: evidence from publication patterns","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Methodology","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Positive economics; Homogeneity (statistics); Economic methodology; Economics; Philosophy and economics; Social science; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Public economics; Philosophy; Philosophy of sport; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0176045,0.000172841,0.0006376524,0.01027558,0.001366668,0.003100323,0.0007243107,0.0005022922,0.005067703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1198102,0.0002398837,0.0003509041,0.01628127,0.002426374,0.003362665,0.003315568,0.000518,0.0008897532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007675407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001215012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001863384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002200966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9790809,0.006836291,0.003498732,0.003159176,0.006370769,0.001054131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7505125,0.1479502,0.06461648,0.01398063,0.01735295,0.005587077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003387431,0.00005695552,0.8905076,0.0006689107,0.0002254053,0.0003523619,0.03049914,0.0001549766,0.001604539,0.008280246,0.002127315,0.06518378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001820048,0.00009788245,0.9561995,0.0005257592,0.00006170695,0.0008261909,0.01673182,0.0002734228,0.000808628,0.007791272,0.01663232,0.0000333249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633053,0.01038247,0.004017703,0.003287219,0.0001554127,0.0000497954,0.001602038,0.00003835433,0.01716174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962233,0.001686234,0.000609891,0.0001648589,0.0001527881,0.00002193087,0.0003785803,0.00002560671,0.000736748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09310263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4238261128704078,"score_gpt":0.3745329805758569,"score_spread":0.04929313229455085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}