{"id":"W4412804530","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2025.1013","title":"The influence of human presence and footprint on animal space use in US national parks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; California Department of Fish and Wildlife; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Nevada Department of Transportation; Arizona Game and Fish Department; Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund; Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Michigan Technological University; National Park Service; Ministry of Natural Resources; University of Minnesota; Grand Canyon Conservancy; Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Safari Club International","keywords":"Wildlife; National park; Recreation; Geography; Biodiversity; Wildlife management; Footprint; Bushmeat; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Biology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001221177,0.0001264461,0.0001940185,0.0006055713,0.0003448525,0.0006165087,0.0002892678,0.0002437259,0.001181109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003876275,0.0001261229,0.0003132286,0.0007276624,0.0005754393,0.0003912016,0.0008581488,0.0003460549,0.00009551241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004510003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002959162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02285502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06913325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989731,0.0005557055,0.00005931025,0.0001600586,0.0001255294,0.0001263071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944102,0.002637889,0.001590139,0.0004237153,0.0003158921,0.0006221776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005197774,0.00002196965,0.9981161,0.000003242694,0.00004622018,0.00001465679,0.000099249,0.0001622313,0.000139926,0.00002113901,0.00005053499,0.001272788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.902668e-7,0.00001623588,0.9996036,0.000001237338,0.000005040162,0.0000157045,0.0001236611,0.0001621819,0.00001835216,0.00001038566,0.00004182478,0.00000131888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995126,0.00004365384,0.00004976618,0.00001867033,0.000001196747,0.000001405755,0.0001003969,0.000001665283,0.0002706679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997072,0.00001866467,0.00005877932,0.000007362675,0.000001543816,0.000002912712,0.0001378843,0.00000140554,0.00006422192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02285502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04544395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.020123289497782,"score_gpt":0.2550180999188089,"score_spread":0.2348948104210269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}