{"id":"W4412864943","doi":"10.1257/mic.20220362","title":"Asymmetric Players in a Meritocracy: A Case for Affirmative Action","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Affirmative action; Economics; Microeconomics; Subsidy; Welfare; Meritocracy; Population; Action (physics); Labour economics; Infinitesimal; Mathematics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00453544,0.0007230972,0.001559776,0.0007632177,0.002848074,0.005700945,0.002472995,0.005674055,0.01890129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01432609,0.0003831449,0.001162147,0.0006845353,0.007657996,0.004983972,0.003802375,0.005018028,0.001461134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002677497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001848142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005569497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005655841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996453,0.001661447,0.00008397667,0.0005375222,0.000461622,0.000802437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929082,0.0032239,0.001331799,0.000781915,0.0003261148,0.001428077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001118303,0.00008916438,0.001298691,0.00002463647,0.00002172409,0.0003061989,0.0003965446,0.007606926,0.0002793199,0.9839994,0.001840341,0.004025248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001660955,0.00004583635,0.0005917514,0.00003172491,0.00001689947,0.0001075759,0.0003541025,0.03111327,0.00008169103,0.9629146,0.004551144,0.00002535414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4291172,0.0006037815,0.1799712,0.04642154,0.0004260013,0.0004497406,0.0006807234,0.0001329052,0.3421969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677621,0.0001639142,0.0103156,0.001662008,0.000142784,0.0001515272,0.0000463715,0.00002329996,0.01973236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01890129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06323111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0294646235309577,"score_gpt":0.386079493534342,"score_spread":0.3566148700033843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}