{"id":"W4412949136","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1645901","title":"AI for One Welfare: the role of animal welfare scientists in developing valid and ethical AI-based welfare assessment tools","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien; Universität für Bodenkultur Wien","keywords":"Welfare; Animal welfare; Artificial intelligence; Process (computing); Computer science; Machine learning; Economics; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001862727,0.0003009311,0.0005198599,0.001032913,0.001129908,0.0001855247,0.0008908838,0.0001919041,0.00001918292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002497084,0.0002597517,0.00009990935,0.002464044,0.001618159,0.0004314945,0.0006799013,0.0005818697,5.086381e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003279428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003506249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001283368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001421779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970421,0.0001915935,0.0006135719,0.0008532848,0.0005929842,0.0007064326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990149,0.0001015695,0.0001337267,0.0004320956,0.0002371272,0.00008055056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005292286,0.0007692242,0.5023099,0.001227292,0.00009149381,0.0003432452,0.00227939,0.00008312911,0.1136781,0.3207803,0.001238798,0.05190683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009067582,0.001978853,0.9595481,0.0002494489,0.00002580066,0.00002237611,0.002119927,0.002794106,0.0004534014,0.0006578641,0.03090551,0.0003378219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9300369,0.0005880594,0.006924667,0.0586154,0.0009235746,0.001204099,0.0001146053,0.00005647508,0.001536214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797901,0.00002677977,0.01919456,0.0007385179,0.00001594322,0.0001948798,0.000009597827,0.00001647923,0.00001315098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4572383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05548398272111539,"score_gpt":0.3839523303902059,"score_spread":0.3284683476690905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}